AN ANALYSIS OF THE MEDIA AND GOVERNMENT RELATIONSHIP

Yusuf YÜKSEL
8.723 914

Öz


This article analyzed the relationship between the media and government. Understanding the dynamics of this relationship is essential as it has implications on the information public gets and strong democracy. For this purpose, different media systems, theories and approaches (cascade model, indexing approach, propaganda theory and hegemonic perspective) were discussed in terms of the media-government relationship.

It is clear that the degree of commercialization, political parallelism, and norms of journalistic professionalism in different media systems influence the degree and nature of this relationship. In terms of theories, although each theory and model constitutes a unique map for making sense some of the important factors in this relationship, cascade model provides a more comprehensive picture. As suggested in this model, political actors, the media and the public mutually influence and interact with each other at different levels and under certain conditions. Specifically, the interaction of four different variables (cultural congruence, power, strategy, and motivation) influences the government's capacity of setting agenda, the circulation of the preferred frames and attention and support of the public. All these variables and how they are used in news management and political rhetoric were discussed and exemplified in this article.  


Anahtar kelimeler


Media Systems; News Management; Political Rhetoric; Hegemony; Propaganda Theory; Indexing Approach; Framing; Cascade Model

Tam metin:

PDF


Referanslar


Barber B R (2003) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, University of California Media, Berkeley.

Barrett O B (2004) Judith Miller, the New York Times and the Propaganda Model, Journalism Studies, 5, 435-449.

Bateson G (1972) Steps to Ecology of Mind: Collected

Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology, Balllantine, New York. in Anthropology,

Bennett W L (1990) Toward a Theory of Media-State Relations in the United States, Journal of Communication, 40, 103-125.

Carey J W (2002) American Journalism On, Before, and After September 11, Z Barbie and A Stuart (eds), Journalism After September 11, Rutledge, New York, pp 71-91.

Chadwick A (2006) Parties, Candidates, and Elections: E-campaigning, Oxford University Media, Oxford.

Cobb R W and Elder C D (1971) The Politics of

Perspective for Modern Democratic Theory, The Journal of Politics, 33, 892-915.

Cook T (1989) Making Laws and Making News, The Brooking Institution, Washington D. C.

Deetz S A (1994) Future of Discipline: The Challenges, the Research, and the Social Contribution,

Communication yearbook, Sage, California, pp 565-600. Stanley

(ed), Donsbach W and Patterson T E (2004) Political News

Professionalism, and Political Roles in Five Countries. F Esser and B Pfetsch (eds), Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 251-271.

Partisanship, Downie L and Kaiser R G (2003) The News about The News: American Journalism in Peril, Vintage Books, New York.

Entman R M (1991) Framing U.S. Coverage of International News: Contrasts in Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents, Journal of Communication, 41, 6-27.

Entman R M (1993) Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm, Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.

Entman R M (2003) Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame After 9/11, Political Communication, 20, 415-432.

Entman R M (2004) Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy, University of Chicago Media, Chicago.

Entman R M (2007) Framing Bias: Media in the

Communication, 57, 163-173. Journal

of Esser F and Pfetsch B (2004). Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases and Challenges, Cambridge University Media, Cambridge.

Gamson W A (1989) News as Framing: Comments on Graber, American Behavioral

Scientist, 33, 157-161.

Gitlin T (1979) News as Ideology and Contested Area: Toward a Theory of Hegemony, Crisis, and Opposition, Socialist review, 9, 11-54.

Gruvitch M and Blumler J G (2004) State of the Communication Research:

Maturity?, F Esser and B Pfetsch (eds), Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 325-344. Political Poised

for Hacker K L (2000) Introduction. Presidential Candidate Images. Littlefield Publishers, New York.

Hall S (1982) The Rediscovery of Ideology: Return of the Remedied in Media Studies, M Gurevitch, T Bennett and J Woollcott (eds), Culture, Society, and the Media, Methuen, London, pp 56-90.

Hallin D C (1988). The Uncensored War: The Media and Vietnam, University of California Media, Berkeley.

Hallin D C and Mancini P (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge. University

Media, Herman E S and Chomsky N (1988) Manufacturing Consent: A Propaganda Model, Pantheon Books, New York.

Holtz-Bacha C (2004) Political Campaign Communication. Conditional Convergence of Modern Media Elections, F Esser and B Pfetsch Communication: Theories,

Challenges, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 213-231. Political Cases,

And Jamieson K H and Waldman P (2003) The Media Effect, Oxford University Media, Oxford.

Kern M Just M and Norris P (2003) Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government and the Public, Rutledge, New York.

Kriesi H (2004) Transnational Trends in Political Communication: Conventional Views and New Realities, F Esser and B Pfetsch (eds), Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 45-64.

Kohut A (2008) But What Do the Polls Show? Graber D A and Norris P (eds), The Politics of News: The News of Politics, CQ Media, Washington D.C, pp. 190-207.

Lakoff G (2004) Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate, Chelsea Green Publishing, Vermont. Lippmann

Macmillan, New York. Public

opinion, McChesney R W (1999) Rich Media, Poor Democracy:

Dubious Times. University of Chicago Media, Chicago. Politics

in McCombs M E (2004) Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion, Polity Media, Cambridge. McQuail D

Communication Theory (5th ed.), Sage, CA. McQuail’s

Mass Neuendorf K A (2001) The Content Analysis Guidebook, Sage, London. Norris

Communication: Good Governance, Human Development, and Mass Communication, F Esser and B Pfetsch (eds), Comparing Political Communication:

Challenges, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 115-151. Global Political Cases,

and Patrick B A and Thrall T A (2007) Beyond Hegemony: Classical Propaganda Theory and Presidential Communication Strategy after the Invasion of Iraq, Mass Communication and Society, 10, 95-118.

Pfetsch B (2004) From political culture to political communications culture: A theoretical approach to comparative analysis, F Esser and B Communication: Theories,

Challenges, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 325-344. Political Cases,

and Reese S D Gandy O H and Grant A E (eds) (2001) Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, Mahwah.

Associates, Reese S (2004) Militarized Journalism: Framing Dissent in the Persian Gulf Wars, Z Barbie and A Stuart (eds), Reporting War: Journalism in Wartime, Rutledge, New York, pp 247-265.

Robertson J W (2004) People’s Watchdog or Government Poodles?, European Journal of Communication, 19, 457- 482.

Schiller H I (1989) Culture, Inc.: The Corporate Takeover of Public Expedition, Oxford University Media, New York. Schmitt-Beck

Communication Effects: The Impact of Mass Media and Personal Conversations on Voting, F Esser and B Pfetsch (eds), Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 271-293.

Swanson D L (2004) Transnational Trends in Political Communication: Conventional Views and New Realities, F Esser and B Pfetsch (eds), Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 45-64.

Tunstall J (2008) The Media Were American: U.S. Media in Decline, Oxford University Media, Oxford.

Van Gorp B (2005) Where is the Frame?, European Journal of Communication, 20, 484- 507.

Waisbord S (2002) Journalism, Risk and Patriotism, Z Barbie and A Stuart (eds), Journalism after September 11, Rutledge, New York, pp 201-220.

West D M (2005) Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns, 1952- 2004, Washington D. C. Quarterly

Media, Yang J (2003) Framing the NATO Air Strike on Kosovo across Countries: Comparison of Chinese and US Newspaper Coverage, International Journal for Communication Studies, 65, 231-249.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

İndekslendiği Kaynaklar: